郭位的《核電關鍵報告》新書,能否經得起專家考驗? 好奇寶寶介入式參與公共議題

文字-A A +A

好奇寶寶當公民記者到10月就滿六年了,,被新聞系教授推薦去參加行政院研考會的研究計畫案,參與學者專家會議談作公民記者的關切議題、動機、目的時,我提到因為住家附近的廣慈博愛院BOT案啟蒙了公民意識,投入公民參與報導。。。

行政院研考會「政府施政過程中公民新聞角色」研究案 好奇寶寶的公民參與 

http://www.peopo.org/news/112981

一種『使命感』讓我一個退休白髮人士,硬學硬幹,紀錄下社會不公益的事情!一開始是『好奇』,我用攝影機紀錄下現場,一刀不剪的呈現,完全不合乎新聞既定規則兩分鐘的制式要求,與新聞記者做區隔,要看實況就來好奇寶寶的園地,自詡是「好奇寶寶 臺灣發聲」,之後又添加了直播的花樣,其實也是省事,不需要做太多後製的工。在這些階段都是讓大家看到實況,鮮少發議論。再過來看到新頭殼的新聞,是邀請相關人士上節目,做談話性節目的報導,我也架起機器,自己擔任主持人,訪問來賓,這真『好玩』!也曾在FB上與專家學者談論時事,最後做成報導分享。

好奇寶寶也一直鼓吹社運團體要自立自強,自己發新聞,讓實況被看到,不要光做成CD片,放在抽屜裡,將來成為該NGO的歷史文物,沒有大眾傳播的即時功能。所以影音記錄設備,由攝影機、到照相機、到手機,就是要讓所有人知道,設備不是問題,影音品質也不計較,要讓外界看到影像才是重點!

近來老媽中風,無為能力再跑現場,只能接收FB及電子信的訊息來做報導素材。現在第一次發想,隔空邀約有志之士對時事提出評論,引領話題,可真有趣!

事情是這樣的,在電子信上看到網友提及清華大學核工相關系所,對校友發出的訊息:

系友們好:

天下文化於2013年5月22日出版《核電關鍵報告》。郭位校長/香港城市大學在書中論述了對核電等七彩能源、環保與工安的看法。除了台灣正體字版外,本書的香港版、中文簡體字版、日文版和英文版也將分別在香港、北京、東京和紐約出版。

茲附上該書台灣版的鏈接:

http://www.bookzone.com.tw/event/wsl001/index.html
http://www.bookzone.com.tw/Publish/book.asp?bookno=WSL001

歡迎登入訂閱,或請在相關臉書及其他合適的管道與他人分享資訊。

─本書籍版稅將捐給學生當作獎學金─

@@@@@@

好奇寶寶上網蒐集到相關新聞報導就做了以下的邀約:

蘇博士,您好

香港校長出書,媒體的新聞結尾是這樣下的結論:

。。。郭位表示,大眾最關心的核廢料問題,可望有方法解決,不過,目前不管是放在水中冷卻的濕處理還是埋在土中的乾處理,都無法完全解決核廢料問題。最好的方法則是目前正在研發的技術,把核原料徹底燃燒,不產生任何廢物。

他更大膽預測,除了以石油能源為主的國家外,發展核電已成美國、瑞典等國家發展趨勢。未來核電機組的數量,如果不再發生重大意外,將逐年增加。

恐懼核能? 郭位:台灣風險評估不夠

http://newtalk.tw/news/2013/06/07/37152.html

好奇寶寶家中有中風老媽需要照顧,沒空看,請蘇博士幫忙看看給個評論,作為我的報導材料,可以嗎?

會以邀約蘇博士的方式報導。

公民記者 好奇寶寶

@@@@@@@@@

蘇博士是之前報導過的核能專家,雖然清華核工系所畢業,赴美留學並發展,但心懷臺灣,幾十年來關心臺灣核能發展,多次寫信到政府機構提供核能安全相關意見,但是核能電廠仍是一座座的蓋,沒有達到他建言的理想。我想請他針對此訊息回應應該是最適切的了,果然。。。

蘇博士的回應很快就到了,原來他和香港郭位校長是舊識,同在一間公司服務過,他公開提出要與郭位辯論,他用英文表達,第一句話就上擂臺表達要公開辯論:

If anyone can forward this e-mail to Dr. Way Kuo, I want to have an open and honest debate with him in front of the People of Taiwan.

Dr. Kuo Way has said many things that are not correct.
I will challenge him on the Software Reliability of the large software project of Using Digital Network Real-Time Control on the TaiPower Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.

Dr. Kuo Way and I worked for the famous AT&T Bell Laboratories previously.
He should know the AT&T Software issue crashed the AT&T long distance network in 1990 below.

The Crash of the AT&T Network in 1990

http://www.phworld.org/history/attcrash.htm

The following is a magazine excerpt about the "crash" of the AT&T Long Distance Network in 1990 when faulty software was installed on the Number 4 ESS (Electronic Switching System) toll tandems throughout the network. The software glitch managed to disable many switches throughout the network until the problem was attributed to the faulty software and a previous version was installed.
The AT&T Crash from "The Risks Digest"
The following is an excerpt from The Risks Digest - Volume 9, Issue 62 - February 26, 1990.
Cause of AT&T network failure

Software crashes on other systems might just restart the crashed systems (such as Taiwan High-Speed Train System), which might take several hours or days.
However, software crashes on Nuclear Power Plants might cause Nuclear Disasters.
Therefore, if Taiwan Power Company, AEC, and some NE-ESS Professors have the fundamental concept of the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants, they would not choose this World Number-One Design of 40,000 input signals of the Digital Network Real Time Control on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.

郭位表示,大眾最關心的核廢料問題,可望有方法解決,不過,目前不管是放在水中冷卻的濕處理還是埋在土中的乾處理,都無法完全解決核廢料問題。最好的方法則是目前正在研發的技術,把核原料徹底燃燒,不產生任何廢物。

I believe Dr. Way Kuo forgot the fundamental of Nuclear Physics about this.
Please find some Physics Professors from National Taiwan University and/or National Tsing Hua University to discuss this to point out the mistakes of Dr. Way Kuo's thinking.

Burning cannot change the nature of Nuclear Wastes.
Radioactive material is still radioactive even after burning.

If burning will solve the issues of nuclear wastes, USA would not spend over US$40 Billions over the past 50 years.
Please see the report from the Wall Street Journal below.
One of the experts who were interviewed is the Chairman of the MIT Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.

US has spent over US$40 Billions about how to handle and store the high-radiated nuclear wastes.
However, there are no solutions (please read the WSJ, April 11, 2013 report below).

How Should We Deal With Nuclear Waste?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732478950457838272205165968...

High-level nuclear waste has been piling up in the U.S. for decades, and we still have no permanent home for it.
Journal Report
Insights from The Experts
Read more at WSJ.com/EnergyReport
More in Big Issues: Energy
Is It Time to Put Power Lines Underground?
How to Fix the Gas Tax
Should Offshore Drilling Be Expanded?
Who Should Regulate Fracking?
Policy makers have been wrestling with the issue since at least 1982, when Congress mandated that waste be stored deep underground. In 1987, lawmakers chose Yucca Mountain in Nevada as a permanent repository; while it was being built, utilities simply stored spent fuel inside cooling pools at nuclear-reactor sites, while paying the government to permanently dispose of the waste.
But billions of dollars and decades later, the U.S. is back to square one. Nevada wasn't happy hosting the nation's nuclear-waste dump, and the Obama administration formally pulled the plug on Yucca Mountain in 2010.
We asked Jack Spencer, senior research fellow for nuclear-energy policy at the Heritage Foundation, Edwin Lyman, senior scientist in the global security program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Richard K. Lester, head of the department of nuclear science and engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to weigh in on the issue. Here are edited excerpts:
--- Jim Su, NE1976, NEG1980, PhD, CISSP

後記:

好奇寶寶

Thank you for the post.

I did not meet with Dr. Way Kuo.
He left AT&T Bell Laboratories before I joined AT&T Bell Laboratories.
He might work for AT&T Bell Labs. at Chicago (actually, Naperville where Dr. Ming-Yuan Hsiao lives now) Illinois, and I worked for AT&T Bell Labs. at Holmdel and Whippany, New Jersey.

I think he has ambition to be the next  National Tsing-Hua University, HsinChu, Taiwan.
He lost in the selection process about 6 years ago.
--- Jim Su

FB留言板

PeoPo 討論區

回應文章建議規則:

  • 文章屬於開放討論空間,回應文章的議題與內容不代表本站的立場
  • 於明知不實或過度謾罵之言論,本站及文章撰寫者保留刪除權
  • 請勿留下身份證字號、住址等個人隱私資料,以免遭人盜用,本站不負管理之責
  • 回應禁止使用HTML語法
0

加入時間: 2007.10.20

好奇寶寶

加入時間: 2007.10.20
5,347則報導
249則影音
6則OnTV

作者其他報導

7:17
6:38

關懷的種子要發芽

作者
2020-07-08

郭位的《核電關鍵報告》新書,能否經得起專家考驗? 好奇寶寶介入式參與公共議題

搜尋表單

目前累積了145,445篇報導,共11,104位公民記者

目前累積了145,445篇報導

11,104位公民記者